<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Queries: Really Not That Complicated	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/</link>
	<description>Literary Agent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 22:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: How to Write a Query Letter for Your Book &#124; Byline		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-442056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to Write a Query Letter for Your Book &#124; Byline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-442056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Queries: Really Not That Complicated  [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Queries: Really Not That Complicated  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: homepage		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-430347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homepage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-430347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Publishing Information Right Here! &#124; Rachelle Gardner		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-401468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publishing Information Right Here! &#124; Rachelle Gardner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-401468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Queries: Really Not That Complicated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Queries: Really Not That Complicated [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lg 42lk450u		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-333555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lg 42lk450u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-333555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I originally commented I clicked the &quot;Notify me when new comments are added&quot; checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get three emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Bless you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I originally commented I clicked the &#8220;Notify me when new comments are added&#8221; checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get three emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Bless you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: what is server		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-333208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[what is server]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-333208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey would you mind sharing which blog platform you&#039;re using? I&#039;m going to start my own blog soon but I&#039;m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/home/eagerbea/domains/rachellegardner.com/public_html/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I&#039;m looking for something completely unique.                  P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey would you mind sharing which blog platform you&#8217;re using? I&#8217;m going to start my own blog soon but I&#8217;m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/home/eagerbea/domains/rachellegardner.com/public_html/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I&#8217;m looking for something completely unique.                  P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Casino Games		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-326178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casino Games]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-326178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Woah! I&#039;m really digging the template/theme of this site. It&#039;s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it&#039;s difficult to get that &quot;perfect balance&quot; between usability and visual appearance. I must say you have done a great job with this. Also, the blog loads extremely fast for me on Opera. Outstanding Blog!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah! I&#8217;m really digging the template/theme of this site. It&#8217;s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it&#8217;s difficult to get that &#8220;perfect balance&#8221; between usability and visual appearance. I must say you have done a great job with this. Also, the blog loads extremely fast for me on Opera. Outstanding Blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucy		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;P.S. For a truly hilarious post on &#034;addressed personally to&#034; see Nathan Bransford&#039;s blog here:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2010/06/query-stats-salutations.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We&#039;re still trying to figure out how one of the unfortunate queriers came up with &#034;Martha Bransford.&#034;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>P.S. For a truly hilarious post on &quot;addressed personally to&quot; see Nathan Bransford&#39;s blog here:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2010/06/query-stats-salutations.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2010/06/query-stats-salutations.html</a></p>
<p>We&#39;re still trying to figure out how one of the unfortunate queriers came up with &quot;Martha Bransford.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucy		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;@ Kathleen-so much to say...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#034;My question is this: when you say &#039;addressed to us personally&#039;--this is supposed to be where we say why we picked YOU instead of Agent Next Door, right? My frustration is writing such a thing without sounding like I&#039;m pandering.&#034; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kathleen, there&#039;s a difference between &#034;addressed personally&#034; and personalization.  For the first, the agent&#039;s name, spelled correctly, i.e. &#034;Dear Ms. Gardner&#034; is all you need.  &#034;Dear Agent,&#034; &#034;Dear Bob,&#034; and &#034;To whom it may concern&#034; are neither personal nor appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the second, it&#039;s not a question of why you think this agent is better than other agents, but why you think your project will be a good fit.  Why do you want this agent to rep your book?  If the answer is &#034;because they&#039;re an agent,&#034; you clearly haven&#039;t done your homework.  But no matter the case, there&#039;s no need to pander.  Honestly, if it bothers you, there&#039;s no need to personalize beyond &#034;Dear [insert correct name].&#034;  A nicely personalized letter can help the overall impression, but it&#039;s not the most critical aspect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope this helps!  :-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lucy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>@ Kathleen-so much to say&#8230;</p>
<p>&quot;My question is this: when you say &#39;addressed to us personally&#39;&#8211;this is supposed to be where we say why we picked YOU instead of Agent Next Door, right? My frustration is writing such a thing without sounding like I&#39;m pandering.&quot; </p>
<p>Kathleen, there&#39;s a difference between &quot;addressed personally&quot; and personalization.  For the first, the agent&#39;s name, spelled correctly, i.e. &quot;Dear Ms. Gardner&quot; is all you need.  &quot;Dear Agent,&quot; &quot;Dear Bob,&quot; and &quot;To whom it may concern&quot; are neither personal nor appropriate.</p>
<p>For the second, it&#39;s not a question of why you think this agent is better than other agents, but why you think your project will be a good fit.  Why do you want this agent to rep your book?  If the answer is &quot;because they&#39;re an agent,&quot; you clearly haven&#39;t done your homework.  But no matter the case, there&#39;s no need to pander.  Honestly, if it bothers you, there&#39;s no need to personalize beyond &quot;Dear [insert correct name].&quot;  A nicely personalized letter can help the overall impression, but it&#39;s not the most critical aspect.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!  🙂</p>
<p>Lucy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Susan Bourgeois		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Bourgeois]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;Rachelle,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lauradroege brought up some excellent points in her post regarding a platform for non-fiction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m sure many of us would be interested in your reply to some of her concerns. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It would be great if you could elaborate about the importance of when a platform should come into the picture.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of us realize that there&#039;s a great advantage for the writer who has an established platform.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What about the writer who has the confidence in their ability to establish a platform based on their past performances in sales and marketing?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could this also be considered as an asset?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Rachelle,</p>
<p>Lauradroege brought up some excellent points in her post regarding a platform for non-fiction.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure many of us would be interested in your reply to some of her concerns. </p>
<p>It would be great if you could elaborate about the importance of when a platform should come into the picture.</p>
<p>Most of us realize that there&#39;s a great advantage for the writer who has an established platform.</p>
<p>What about the writer who has the confidence in their ability to establish a platform based on their past performances in sales and marketing?</p>
<p>Could this also be considered as an asset?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kathy taylor		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kathy taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;Yes, it seems the more I read about it the more confused I become. But! I am finding my way out of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Yes, it seems the more I read about it the more confused I become. But! I am finding my way out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dining table		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31894</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dining table]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;You have a very interesting topic. Reading your post is so much fun. The comments are all so good. Reading it will definitely going the topic clearer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>You have a very interesting topic. Reading your post is so much fun. The comments are all so good. Reading it will definitely going the topic clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie Weathers		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Weathers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;Robert--I know this is harsh, but writers who whine about ambiguous query letter expectations can probably be linked directly to a manuscript that is sub-par. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes, it is harsh. I don&#039;t mind studying agents. Following them on their social media and going over their submissions guidelines with a fine-tooth comb. It doesn&#039;t do a bit of good if they don&#039;t say specifically what they want.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If putting your word count at the end of the query makes an agent want to delete the query on sight if it isn&#039;t done that way, then just note that in the submission guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I will be happy to jump through hoop d, a, c, e, b in exactly that order if that&#039;s what the agent wants. Just put it somewhere so I know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It has nothing to do with my ability as a writer, the quality of my manuscript or my personal level of insanity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just plainly state what you want as an agent and I will send you exactly that. Nothing more and nothing less.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Robert&#8211;I know this is harsh, but writers who whine about ambiguous query letter expectations can probably be linked directly to a manuscript that is sub-par. </p>
<p>Yes, it is harsh. I don&#39;t mind studying agents. Following them on their social media and going over their submissions guidelines with a fine-tooth comb. It doesn&#39;t do a bit of good if they don&#39;t say specifically what they want.</p>
<p>If putting your word count at the end of the query makes an agent want to delete the query on sight if it isn&#39;t done that way, then just note that in the submission guidelines.</p>
<p>I will be happy to jump through hoop d, a, c, e, b in exactly that order if that&#39;s what the agent wants. Just put it somewhere so I know.</p>
<p>It has nothing to do with my ability as a writer, the quality of my manuscript or my personal level of insanity.</p>
<p>Just plainly state what you want as an agent and I will send you exactly that. Nothing more and nothing less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: February Grace		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31892</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[February Grace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;@ Meagan: No worries, thank you for the clarification. Was kind of you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@ Robert: Ouch.  Unless you&#039;ve read someone&#039;s manuscript I really don&#039;t think automatically blaming their confusion with the process, especially at first, is fair at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@ Everyone- yes, the picture would be funny- honestly- but it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an unhappy coincidence that I have to wear disfiguring glasses in real life (plus 15 correction for aphakia)or I can&#039;t see.  The picture in my blogger profile is glasses I can&#039;t wear anymore that were paired with contacts that are no longer an option for me. I also happen to have as anyone can see, blue eyes and dark hair. Still you&#039;ve got to have a sense of humor when these things happen...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@Ms. Gardener  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you again for the post- it may have made me look like a whiner and opened me up to insult by people who haven&#039;t even read my work, but if it helped one other writer in that you responded to it, it was worth having made the original comment.  Now I don&#039;t ever have to question the process again because someone in the know gave a straight answer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>@ Meagan: No worries, thank you for the clarification. Was kind of you.</p>
<p>@ Robert: Ouch.  Unless you&#39;ve read someone&#39;s manuscript I really don&#39;t think automatically blaming their confusion with the process, especially at first, is fair at all.</p>
<p>@ Everyone- yes, the picture would be funny- honestly- but it <i>is</i> an unhappy coincidence that I have to wear disfiguring glasses in real life (plus 15 correction for aphakia)or I can&#39;t see.  The picture in my blogger profile is glasses I can&#39;t wear anymore that were paired with contacts that are no longer an option for me. I also happen to have as anyone can see, blue eyes and dark hair. Still you&#39;ve got to have a sense of humor when these things happen&#8230;</p>
<p>@Ms. Gardener  </p>
<p>Thank you again for the post- it may have made me look like a whiner and opened me up to insult by people who haven&#39;t even read my work, but if it helped one other writer in that you responded to it, it was worth having made the original comment.  Now I don&#39;t ever have to question the process again because someone in the know gave a straight answer.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Michael		</title>
		<link>https://rachellegardner.com/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31891</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachellegardner.flywheelsites.com/2010/06/queries-really-not-that-complicated/#comment-31891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;I know this is harsh, but writers who whine about ambiguous query letter expectations can probably be linked directly to a manuscript that is sub-par.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To those who think agents are unfair, mentally challenged or downright evil:  agents desire to be successful just as you do.  The difference is that they need twenty to thirty successful authors (or one really Super Author)to provide them the same income you expect from your Great American Novel.  The difficulty they face is that they must sift through tons of aspiring, talented writers to choose those which fit their services and hold some glimpse of a promise to have a story that they can represent.  &lt;br /&gt;Publishing has been, for better or worse, distilled down to a marketing decision. Talent and art, imagination and creativity, story arc and theme are still sought after elements of a prospective novel, but the bottom line is going to be &#034;can I sell this book to XYZ publisher?&#034;&lt;br /&gt;Your query letter should fit this format:  a good letter that sells the concept of your novel and reveals not only the skeleton of your plot and the major conflict but also your voice and talent.  Sadly, this is the audition.  If you have ever tried out for a sport, a position in a chorus or a play, you may be acquainted with the process. It is competitive, it can be unfair, it can be fraught with poor judgment and the errors that come with the mind-numbing task of sorting through thousands of vanilla letters. Agents (and editors) should be approached with the same compassion that the hard-working, committed author is deserved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>I know this is harsh, but writers who whine about ambiguous query letter expectations can probably be linked directly to a manuscript that is sub-par.  </p>
<p>To those who think agents are unfair, mentally challenged or downright evil:  agents desire to be successful just as you do.  The difference is that they need twenty to thirty successful authors (or one really Super Author)to provide them the same income you expect from your Great American Novel.  The difficulty they face is that they must sift through tons of aspiring, talented writers to choose those which fit their services and hold some glimpse of a promise to have a story that they can represent.  <br />Publishing has been, for better or worse, distilled down to a marketing decision. Talent and art, imagination and creativity, story arc and theme are still sought after elements of a prospective novel, but the bottom line is going to be &quot;can I sell this book to XYZ publisher?&quot;<br />Your query letter should fit this format:  a good letter that sells the concept of your novel and reveals not only the skeleton of your plot and the major conflict but also your voice and talent.  Sadly, this is the audition.  If you have ever tried out for a sport, a position in a chorus or a play, you may be acquainted with the process. It is competitive, it can be unfair, it can be fraught with poor judgment and the errors that come with the mind-numbing task of sorting through thousands of vanilla letters. Agents (and editors) should be approached with the same compassion that the hard-working, committed author is deserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: rachellegardner.com @ 2026-04-14 19:43:34 by W3 Total Cache
-->